Perez

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20221:19-cv-00400California5,977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

21 Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 22 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the 23 Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On May 13, 2020, the court dismissed the 24 Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 15.) On August 31, 2020, 25 Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 21.) On September 8, 2020, the court 26 dismissed the First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF 27 No. 23.) On April 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 32.) On 28 October 6, 2021, the court dismissed the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 39.) On December 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Third Amended Complaint, which is now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 39.) 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.