(PC) Hammler v. Dignity Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20221:20-cv-01778California826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-01778-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 15) DIGNITY HEALTH, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Allen Hammler initiated this action as a prisoner proceeding pro se by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to the assigned United States magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. On December 1, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the district court deny Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff qualifies as a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the Complaint did not contain sufficient facts to allege imminent danger of serious physical injury. (Doc. No. 15 at 2-8.) The magistrate judge recommended the district court direct Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee or face…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.