Rasey

(PC) Williams v. Rasey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20221:21-cv-00203California722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00203-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

C.RASEY, (ECF Nos. 34) Defendant. 14 Plaintiff David Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 29, 2021, the Clerk noted on the record that the Court’s November 17, 2021, minute order regarding a settlement conference had been returned as “[r]efused” after it was mailed to Plaintiff. (See ECF No. 33). It appears that Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court updated as to his current address as required by the Court’s prior order and Local Rule 182(f). (See ECF No. 3, p. 5). On December 23, 2021, Defendant C. Rasey moved for partial summary judgment respecting Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant removed or terminated Plaintiff from his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.