(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-0466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF Nos. 138, 141, 143, 159, 163) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court are a dispositive motion for summary judgment by the last remaining defendants in this action, and multiple surrounding motions by pro se plaintiff Prakash Narayan. (ECF Nos. 138, 141, 143, 159, 163.) Plaintiff’s motions consist of (1) a motion for leave to amend the complaint (ECF Nos. 138, 141)2; (2) a motion to vacate the undersigned’s October 15, 2021 order modifying the prior Scheduling Order (ECF No. 143); and (3) an amended ex parte application to enter default judgment in plaintiff’s favor (ECF No. 163). All of 24 Because plaintiff is self-represented, all pretrial proceedings are referred to the 25 undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21).
26 Plaintiff’s notice of motion (ECF…