Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20222:20-cv-00354California512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. On March 17, 2021, the undersigned ordered service of the complaint on defendants Dayson, Houston, Vallar, Siegel, Rodgers, Hurley, and Lozano. (ECF No. 22.) Service was returned executed on defendants Hurley and Lozano (ECF No. 26), but unexecuted as to Dayson, Houston, Vallar, Siegel, and Rodgers (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff was instructed to provide additional information so that these defendants could be served. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff sought and received extension of time to provide the information. Plaintiff submitted the necessary materials to initiate service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.