(HC) Vela v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20221:20-cv-00588California18,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 1:20-cv-00588-JLT-EPG Document 28 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL A. VELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00588-JLT-EPG-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF SECOND

v. AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

W.L. MONTGOMERY, (ECF No. 20) Respondent.

Petitioner Manuel A. Vela is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

14 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his second amended petition, Petitioner asserts

15 that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that Petitioner harbored the

16 required specific intent and that trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. For the reasons

17 discussed herein, the undersigned recommends denial of the second amended petition for writ of

18 habeas corpus.

I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.