Sharp

Sharp v. Bolin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20221:21-cv-01549California2,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY A. SHARP, Case No. 1:21-cv-01549-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF TO BE A

v. THREE-STRIKE LITIGANT AND

REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA

BOLIN, et al, PAUPERIS STATUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Defendants.

16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND On October 8, 2021, Plaintiff Anthony A. Sharp (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (K-41609), initiated this civil rights action in the Northern District of California pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendants in their individual and official capacities as employees for the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges he was supposed to receive a Federal Stimulus check of $1,200 but he never received the check, that the check was instead sent to an unknown address with his personal identifying information, and that the IRS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.