Ramadan

(PC) Williams v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20221:21-cv-01760California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO LUIS WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01760-JLT-BAK-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DISMISSING

RAMADAN, et al., ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendants. (Docs. 2, 5)

Clerk of Court to close the case. 17 Antonio Luis Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the assigned magistrate judge1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 14, 2021, the Court issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Doc. 5.) The Court took judicial notice of three cases: (1) Williams v. Wunderlich, Case No. 06-cv-1097 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2006); (2) Williams v. Hagar, Case No. 04-CV-2543 CW (PR) (N.D. Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.