Ferrell

Ferrell v. Buckingham Property Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20221:19-cv-00332California2,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN FERRELL, et al., No. 1:19-cv-00332-JLT-BAK (EPG) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL

APPROVAL AND GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND

COSTS

BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, (Docs. 43 & 44) 15 Defendant. 16 Kevin Ferrell and Cheryl Baker, individually and on behalf of others, filed renewed motions for final approval of their class-action settlement agreement and for attorneys’ fees and costs on October 19, 2021. (Docs. 43 & 44.) These motions replace the previous motions, filed on January 6, 2021 (Docs. 32 & 33), which the Court denied because portions of the Private Attorney General Act payment were scheduled to revert to Defendant Buckingham Property Management (Doc. 39). The Court’s order noted the settlement agreement could otherwise be approved. (Id. at 11.) In this formulation, the only changes to the settlement agreement were the ones the Court found objectionable. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.