Quiring

(PC) Casteneda v. Quiring

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20222:21-cv-02196California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORENZO CASTENEDA, No. 2:21-cv-2196 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

J. QUIRING, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed December 10, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit using this court’s form, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required document. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.