Ramsey

(HC) Prince v. Ramsey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20222:20-cv-01962California349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, No. 2:20-cv-01962-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER MICHAEL RAMSEY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 33.) Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.