McKeown

(PC) McCowan v. McKeown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20222:21-cv-00369California2,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND MCCOWAN, No. 2:21-cv-00369-JAM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER L. MCKEOWN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 1, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and gave him the option of proceeding on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants McKeown, Stephens, and Merrell. ECF No. 9 at 6. In the alternative, plaintiff could file an amended complaint to fix the deficiencies identified in the screening order with respect to the remaining defendants and claims. ECF No. 9 at 6-7. Plaintiff elected to file a first amended complaint which is now before the court for screening. ECF No. 22. As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.