(SS) Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20221:20-cv-01192California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTINA K. RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-1192-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION AND/OR FAILURE TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

SECURITY,

(Doc. No. 5) Defendant. February 11, 2022-Deadline This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. Plaintiff initiated this action proceeding pro se on August 24, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 3). On August 26, 2020, the Clerk issued summons and a scheduling order issued. (Doc. Nos. 4, 5). The summonses were returned executed as to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). (Doc. No. 7). On May 17, 2021, the Commissioner filed the certified administrative record (“CAR”) triggering certain deadlines. (Doc. No. 11). 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.