(HC) Frank v. Warden, USP Atwater

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20221:21-cv-00568California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY LEE FRANK, Case No. 1:21-cv-00568-HBK Petitioner, ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER’S

UNAUTHORIZED PLEADING FROM THE

v. RECORD WARDEN, USP ATWATER, (Doc. No. 37) Respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF PETITION

16 (Doc. No. 38) 17 Petitioner Jimmy Lee Frank (“Petitioner” or “Frank”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1). Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Motion – Change of Law 65% to 75%.” (Doc. No. 37) and Petitioner’s “Motion – Pertaining Respondent Deadline” (Doc. No. 38). A. Motion – Change of Law 65% to 75% The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provide for the filing of a habeas petition (Rule 2), an answer, and a reply (Rule 5). Additional briefing may be permitted upon a court order to expand the record (Rule 7). In this case,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.