Velasco

(PC) Gradford v. Velasco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20221:20-cv-00543California763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-00543-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REOPEN THIS CASE

F. VELASCO, et al., (Doc. No. 74) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff William J. Gradford is a former pretrial detainee who filed this civil rights action on April 16, 2020, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 1, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice as voluntarily dismissed and provided the parties fourteen (14) days to file any objections. (Doc. No. 70.) After no timely objections were filed, this court adopted the findings and recommendations on August 2, 2021, and this case was closed. (Doc. No. 71.) On September 20, 2021, plaintiff filed a document titled “objections due process clause,” 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.