Barber

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20222:19-cv-01338California1,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P

BROWN

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner. On November 12, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion to protect his privacy rights under Rule 59 or 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative, plaintiff moves for reconsideration. (ECF No. 218.) Defendants filed no opposition. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied. II. Background On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to seal confidential medical records. (ECF No. 97.) On September 11, 2020, the undersigned reviewed the medical records, found that as to some of the medical records, the need to protect plaintiff’s sensitive and confidential information outweighed any necessity for disclosure at this time, and partially granted plaintiff’s motion to seal. (ECF No. 116 at 3-4.) 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.