Baker

(PC) Cruz v. Baker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20221:19-cv-00995California820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, No. 1:19-cv-00995-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

B. BAKER, (Doc. Nos. 53, 54) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 15, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order directing him to pay the required filing fee to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 50.) Those findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id. at 3.) After no timely objections were filed, this court adopted the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.