Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY J. REED, No. 2:20-cv-2373 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. PEERY, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 29, 2021, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was determined that his complaint stated a claim against Defendant J. Nakken only. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was directed to inform the Court whether he wished to amend the complaint or to proceed on the viable claim, and he was given fourteen days within which to do so. Id. at 9-10. At that time, Plaintiff was told that a failure to return the Notice on How to Proceed would result in the Court assuming that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened, and that the dismissal without prejudice of all defendants other than J. Nakken as well as of Claims Two and Three would be recommended. More than fourteen days have passed, and Plaintiff has not returned the notice informing the Court how he wishes to proceed. Therefore, the…