Santoro

(HC) Khademi v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20222:21-cv-00902California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:21-cv-0902 WBS KJN P Petitioner, Court of Appeals No. 21-16474 v. ORDER KELLY SANTORO, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 8, 2021, petitioner filed a motion for certificate of appealability and motion for transcripts. As discussed below, petitioner’s motions are denied. On October 28, 2021, the undersigned dismissed this action without prejudice, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Judgment was entered that same day. Petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability sets forth no facts demonstrating that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right [or] that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.