Alcaraz

(PS) Crespo v. Alcaraz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20222:21-cv-02031California1,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL CRESPO, No. 2:21-cv-02031 CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND

CELINA ALCAZAR, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

15 Defendant.

17 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on November 3, 2021 (ECF No. 1) is before the court for screening. Plaintiff filed an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.