Munoz

Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20221:08-cv-00759California5,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL ORDER, v. DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT, AND DENYING PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, MOTION TO DECERTIFY et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 Defendants. Defendants move to decertify the class, ECF 462, and Plaintiffs oppose, ECF 467. As part of their response, Plaintiffs filed—without seeking leave— the expert report of Professor Robert E. Hoyt (Hoyt Report) (ECF 467-3) and a joint report to Congress in 1972 by the Veterans Administration and the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development (Joint Report) (ECF 467-2). As these submissions do not satisfy the final pretrial order’s strict criteria for late witness and exhibit disclosures, see ECF 456, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.