Arnette
(PC) Jones v. Arnette
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS
vs. (ECF No. 118.)
ARNETTE, et al.,
Defendants.
19 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzalez, Flores, Arnett,1 Zamora, and Lopez; Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment Claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener And Gonzalez; and Plaintiff’s Due Process Claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzalez.
28 1 Sued as Arnette. Defendants Vasquez and Lopez remain unserved. On February 8, 2021, summonses were returned unexecuted by the United States Marshal as to Defendants Vasquez and Lopez with the following notations:…