Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20221:16-cv-01212California1,936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

vs. (ECF No. 118.)

ARNETTE, et al.,

Defendants.

19 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzalez, Flores, Arnett,1 Zamora, and Lopez; Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment Claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener And Gonzalez; and Plaintiff’s Due Process Claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzalez.

28 1 Sued as Arnette. Defendants Vasquez and Lopez remain unserved. On February 8, 2021, summonses were returned unexecuted by the United States Marshal as to Defendants Vasquez and Lopez with the following notations:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.