(PC) Deegan v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20222:19-cv-02310California312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNEY ROSS DEEGAN, III, No. 2:19-CV-2310-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 30, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not complied. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, 2 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.