(PS) Tanksley v. Sacramento County Police Dept.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, No. 2:21-cv-02225 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY POLICE
DEPT.; J. HON.,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) and that request was granted (ECF No. 4). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff’s initial complaint was rejected on screening and plaintiff was given leave to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. A first amended complaint (“FAC”) was filed on January 19, 2022. ECF No. 5. That complaint is now before the court for screening. Based on the facts alleged in the FAC, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without further leave to amend because the facts cannot support a claim that would entitle plaintiff to relief. I. THE SCREENING…