Martinez
(HC) Jackson v. Martinez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YONNIE JACKSON, No. 2:17-cv-01311-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER JOSE MARTINEZ, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion asking the Court to reconsider its October 13, 2021 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Id. at 1263. Petitioner does not present newly discovered evidence and there has not been a change in the law. Furthermore, the Court finds that, after a de novo review of this case, the decision to deny the…