Bow

Bow v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20222:21-cv-00444California2,167 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, and No. 2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP

SUSAN WEISINGER,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC, d/b/a Suddenlink Communications; ALTICE

USA, INC.; CEQUEL

COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CEBRIDGE ACQUISITION, L.P.; and CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC, Defendants. 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Kathy Bow, Robert Papp, and Susan Weisinger’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC, d/b/a Suddenlink Communications; Altice USA, Inc.; Cequel Communications, LLC; Cebridge Acquisition, L.P.; and Cequel III Communications I, LLC (“Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 24.) Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No23.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.