Bow
Bow v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHY BOW, ROBERT PAPP, and No. 2:21-cv-00444-TLN-JDP
SUSAN WEISINGER,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC, d/b/a Suddenlink Communications; ALTICE
USA, INC.; CEQUEL
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CEBRIDGE ACQUISITION, L.P.; and CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC, Defendants. 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Kathy Bow, Robert Papp, and Susan Weisinger’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC, d/b/a Suddenlink Communications; Altice USA, Inc.; Cequel Communications, LLC; Cebridge Acquisition, L.P.; and Cequel III Communications I, LLC (“Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 24.) Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No23.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’…