Drevdahl

Drevdahl v. City of Fairfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20222:20-cv-00859California7,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY DREVDAHL, No. 2:20-cv-0859 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF FAIRFIELD, municipal corporation; J. WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and as a police officer for the Fairfield Police Department, 16 Defendants. 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. Pending before the Court are plaintiff’s partial motion for summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 22 & 32.) For the reasons explained below the motions are denied. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, commenced this action on April 27, 2020, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that on September 7, 2019, plaintiff was walking back from a laundry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.