CDCR

(PC) Virgil v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20222:20-cv-01373California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONDELL EARL VIRGIL, Case No. 2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

CDCR, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 On April 20, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 20. I notified plaintiff that it failed state a claim and granted him sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff subsequently requested, and I granted, two sixty-day extensions to file a second amended complaint. ECF Nos. 21-24. Despite those extensions, plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on November 8, 2021, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for both failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.