Magrini
(PC) Brunsvik v. Magrini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS CRAIG BRUNSVIK, Case No. 2:21-cv-00973-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
ERIC MAGRINI, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 On October 6, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 6. I notified plaintiff that he could proceed with his viable due process claim against defendants Johnson, Marlar, and South, but that his remaining claims were not cognizable. Id. at 3-4. I therefore ordered plaintiff, within sixty days, either to file an amended complaint or to notify the court that he wishes to proceed only with his due process claim. Plaintiff failed to comply with that order. Accordingly, on December 28, 2021, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should…