Ascentium Capital, LLC v. Indu Motel, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20222:21-cv-00376California3,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00376 KJM CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

INDU MOTEL, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 Before the court is plaintiff’s (“Ascentium”) motion for default judgment against defendant Indu Motel LLC and two individual defendants, Pragnesh Patel and Vasant Patel. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants, proceeding pro se, failed to file an opposition to the motion for default judgment in accordance with Local Rule 230(c). Accordingly, the hearing on the motion set for October 22, 2021 was vacated and defendants were given additional time to respond to the motion. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants were advised that failure to timely respond would result in a recommendation that default be entered against them. (Id.) Defendants have not timely responded. The undersigned has fully considered the briefs and record in this case and, good cause appearing, THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS: ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.