Shmary

(PC) Israel v. Shmary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20222:21-cv-00262California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL, No. 2:21-cv-0262-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RABBI SHMARY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2022, the court informed plaintiff that she could proceed with certain claims against defendants Brownstein, Eshelman, Muhammed, Safanov, Lainez, Richey, and Lee, or she could file an amended complaint in an effort to also state claims against defendants Warden Covello, Chief Deputy Warden Holmes, Assistant Wardens Williams and Huser, and CDCR Secretary Kathleen Allison. ECF No. 28. Plaintiff has elected not to amend her complaint and to proceed only with the claims identified by the court. ECF No. 29. ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Warden Covello, Chief Deputy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.