Doe

Doe v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20221:21-cv-01103California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY AND CONTINUING

DERRAL ADAMS, et al., MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

TO MARCH 3, 2022

Defendants.

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Jane Doe initiated this action on July 20, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants have answered the complaint. (ECF Nos. 19, 33.) On November 29, 2021, the Court set the mandatory scheduling conference in this matter for February 8, 2022. (ECF No. 21.) Pursuant to the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the 23 scheduling conference. (Id. at 3.) No joint report has been filed in this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.