Doe
Doe v. Adams
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20221:21-cv-01103California490 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY AND CONTINUING
DERRAL ADAMS, et al., MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
TO MARCH 3, 2022
Defendants.
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
16 17 Plaintiff Jane Doe initiated this action on July 20, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants have answered the complaint. (ECF Nos. 19, 33.) On November 29, 2021, the Court set the mandatory scheduling conference in this matter for February 8, 2022. (ECF No. 21.) Pursuant to the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the 23 scheduling conference. (Id. at 3.) No joint report has been filed in this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for…