Stevens

(PC) Kamali v. Stevens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20221:19-cv-01432California692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARBI KAMALI, 1:19-cv-01432-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

DISCOVERY AND CONTINUE

vs. SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES

PENDING RULING ON MOTION FOR

STEVENS, et al., JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF No. 35.) Defendants.

ORDER IMPOSING STAY OF

DISCOVERY AND CONTINUING

SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES, TO

BE RESET IF NEEDED AFTER

RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

23 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Arbi Kamali (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation and excessive force against defendant correctional officers Rose Stevens, Ivan Villegas, Jordan Bryan, and Alen Hernandez (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 16.) On November 29, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.