Elliott

(PC) Ackerson v. Elliott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20222:21-cv-02205California2,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELTON ALVIN ACKERSON, No. 2:21-cv-2205 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 25, 2022, it was recommended that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to pay the fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. However, on January 28, 2022, plaintiff filed the request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The findings and recommendations are vacated. Plaintiff’s declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.