Attinello

(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Attinello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20221:19-cv-01579California2,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GIGI FAIRCHILD-LITTLEFIELD, No. 1:19-cv-01579-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART THE

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SCREENING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS ATTINELLO, et al., (Doc. No. 18.) Defendants. 15 16 Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She filed this action on November 5, 2019, alleging deliberate 18 indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment and that she was 19 retaliated against in violation of the First Amendment after engaging in protected speech related 20 to her medical needs. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff amended her complaint twice; the Second Amended 21 Complaint (“SAC”), (Doc. 17), was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for screening 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 On October 25, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.