(PS) Williams v. McDonald's Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20222:20-cv-01214California2,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRK D. WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-1214 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kirk Williams is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendant’s motion to dismiss, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a third amended complaint, plaintiff’s partial motion to dismiss, and plaintiff’s motion for stay and abeyance. (ECF Nos. 24, 34, 36, 42.) For the reasons explained below, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action on June 17, 2020, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.)

1 Defendant moved to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.