(SS) Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20221:21-cv-00036California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 MARIA TERESA HERNANDEZ, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00036-BAK-GSA

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE

v. AND GRANTING EXTENSION FOR

DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting BRIEF Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

14 On January 27, 2022 the Court entered an order for Defendant to show cause why Defendant 15 did not file a response brief by the January 24 deadline. Doc. 18. Defendant responded on 16 February 3, 2022 indicating that counsel of record is out of the country, inadvertently missed the 17 deadline and neglected to seek an extension. Doc. 19. The parties now stipulate to an extension to 18 February 21, 2022 for Defendant to file the response brief. Doc. 20. 19 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 20 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 21 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 22 Care LLC, 288…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.