Hrones

Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20222:20-cv-00449California246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Glenda Hrones, No. 2:20-cv-00449-KJM-KJIN Plaintiff, ORDER v. Rideout Memorial Hospital DBA Adventist Health and Rideout, et al., Defendants. 17 At the upcoming hearing on February 11, 2022, the parties shall be prepared to discuss in a focused manner this court’s subject matter jurisdiction, including by addressing the authorities 20 cited in this court’s order at ECF No. 38 and the arguments in the supplemental briefs at ECF Nos. 39 and 40. The parties shall also be prepared to discuss whether the hospital 1s judicially estopped 23 from arguing now that this action cannot be adjudicated unless this court interprets a collective 24 bargaining agreement. See generally, e.g., New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001) 25 (interpreting and applying doctrine of judicial estoppel); Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Marilyn Monroe LLC, 692 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2012) (same). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.