(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20221:20-cv-00701California4,278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JUAN TONY FLORES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00701-BAK Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 18).

SECURITY,

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff presents the following issues for adjudication: 1. The ALJ failed to properly evaluate the severity and limiting effects of Plaintiff’s visual impairments, rendering the RFC unsupported because it fails to 27 consider limitations from all of Plaintiff’s medically determinable impairments. 2. The ALJ failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.