Petersen
Petersen v. Buyard
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20221:20-cv-00954California4,186 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00954-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED AND
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH
MEKISHA BUYARD, PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM, PROSECUTE THIS CASE, AND
Defendant. COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS (ECF Nos. 23, 31, 33) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE DAYS
18 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on July 9, 2020, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). The complaint brings a single cause of action under the Fourth Amendment against Defendant Mekisha Buyard concerning the searches of Plaintiff’s cell phones. On April 12, 2021, Defendant moved to dismiss this case, arguing that Plaintiff fails to state a Fourth Amendment claim.…