Kamlade

Kamlade v. LEO Pharma Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20221:21-cv-00522California4,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KAMLADE, No. 1:21-cv-00522-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEO

PHARMA INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

LEO PHARMA INC., et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants.

16 This matter is before the court on defendant LEO Pharma Inc.’s motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 15.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, defendant’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 16.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.

22 Pursuant to stipulation, the parties agreed that the deadline for defendant LEO Pharma A/S to file its response to the complaint shall be extended until the date that is twenty-one (21) days after the court’s ruling on this motion. (Doc. No. 25 at 3.) 24 The undersigned apologizes for the excessive delay in the issuance of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.