(PC) Khademi v. Roseville Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:21-cv-00966California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:21-CV-0966-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 13, captioned “Combined Notice of Motions for Temporary Restraining Order with Notice of the Motion with Discovery Request and the Demand for Jury Trial/Production of Transcript. . . .” To the extent Plaintiff seeks some form of preliminary injunctive relief, the undersigned recommends Plaintiff’s motion be denied for the reasons discussed below. The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction. See Stormans,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.