Villamizar

Villamizar v. Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:14-cv-01737California2,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI 10 PAUL VILLAMIZAR, No. 2:14-cv-01737-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SENIOR CARE PHARMACY

SERVICES, INC.; SAMITENDU

BANERJEE; ARA KEUSGARIAN; and

TONY NGUYEN,

16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. (“Senior Care”), Samitendu Banerjee (“Banerjee”), Ara Keusgarian (“Keusgarian”), and Tony Nguyen’s (“Nguyen”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 106.) Plaintiff Paul Villamizar (“Plaintiff”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 108.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 113.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. (ECF No. 106.) /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court need not recount the background facts of the instant case as they are set forth fully in its April 28, 2021 Order. (ECF No. 88.) Plaintiff asserts eight individual claims against Defendants in his First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.