Hollister

(PS) Eisner v. Hollister

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:21-cv-02337California2,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGIA MILES EISNER, No. 2:21–cv–2337–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (ECF Nos. 2, 4.) DAVID HOLLISTER, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 14, 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint and request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Therein, she named numerous groups of defendants, including members of Plumas County’s police, jail, prosecution offices, the county courts, and a private citizen. The undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915, noted deficiencies, and provided 21 days for plaintiff to amend. (ECF No. 4.) The deadline passed without a response from plaintiff. The court now recommends plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed on the grounds of failure to state facts on which relief might be granted, frivolity, failure to follow a court order, and failure to prosecute.

1 Plaintiff proceeds without the assistance of counsel; thus, this case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.