Napoleon

Napoleon v. USAA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:21-cv-01259California1,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUDITH I. NAPOLEON, No. 2:21-cv-01259-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, and USAA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Judith I. Napoleon’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 10.) Defendant USAA Life Insurance (“USAA Life”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 14.) Defendant United States Automobile Association (“USAA”) did not file an opposition. Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on June 2, 2021, in El Dorado County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1 at 12.) Plaintiff alleges that following the death of her husband, USAA Life refused to provide the agreed upon death benefits pursuant to her husband’s life insurance contract. (Id. at 13–14.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.