Orr

(PC) Muhammad v. Orr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:19-cv-01289California6,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, No. 2:19-cv-01289-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS F. ORR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleging that eight defendants employed at Mule Creek State Prison were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs for treatment for an injury to his right hand. ECF No. 16 (screening order). I. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order Plaintiff seeks an order preventing the CDCR and Mule Creek State Prison Warden, who are not parties to this action, from assigning defendant Orr to work in Facility A during the pendency of this case. ECF No. 56. According to plaintiff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.