(PC)Osejo

(PC)Osejo v. Hurtado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20221:21-cv-01178California936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SERGIO A. OSEJO, No. 1:21-cv-01178-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

HURTADO, et al., (Doc. No. 21) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Sergio A. Osejo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 9, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that plaintiff be required to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 11.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service. (Id.) After no timely objections were filed, this court adopted the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.