Akmal

Akmal v. Walgreens Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20221:20-cv-01015California5,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA AKMAL, No. 1:20-cv-01015-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED

WALGREENS COMPANY, COMPLAINT Defendant. (Doc. No. 10)

17 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 11.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant the motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed her initial complaint in the Fresno County Superior Court on June 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 1-1.) Therein, plaintiff asserted ten claims against defendant Walgreens Company (“Walgreens”). As relevant to the pending motion, plaintiff alleged the following facts. Plaintiff was hired as a staff pharmacist with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.