(PC) Miller v. Mule Creek State Prison
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-1122 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). Additionally, plaintiff has filed what appear to be two motions for extension of time. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and finds plaintiff fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time will be denied as moot. //// //// //// //// IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 3 …