Tri-Dam

Tri-Dam v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20221:20-cv-00408California1,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRI-DAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00408-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST TO DISMISS REMAINING

v. C RL EA QI UM ES S TA N TOD DD EE FN EY RI N EG N TD RE YF E ON FD ANT’S JUDGMENT

SCOTT FRAZIER,

(Docs. 57, 58, 59) Defendant. _____________________________________/

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tri-Dam (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Scott Frazier (“Defendant”), alleging causes of action for violation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 825p, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, and interference with express easement. (Doc. 1.) On October 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment on its public and private nuisance claims, and Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, partial summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings, on all of Plaintiff’s claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.